How Do Unethical Salespeople Sleep at Night? The Role of Neutralizations in the Justification of Unethical Sales Intentions

The purpose of this paper is to propose and test a model illustrating the direct effects of five techniques of neutralizations (denial of responsibility, denial of injury, denial of victim, appeal to higher loyalties, and condemning the condemner) on the ethical intentions of sales people. A sample consisting of 157 sales people responded to an ethical case scenario survey to reveal that two neutralizations were predominant in impacting ethical intentions – these were denial of injury and appeal to higher loyalties. These relationships were tested in three sales behavioral settings: sales promoting, customer relationship building and maintenance, and sales organization. A post-hoc test of moderation effects were included to shed additional light on how some of the neutralizations interact with ethical judgment to impact sales person ethical intentions. Implications for research and practice are discussed as well as directions for further research