Illustrating the difference between a pigovian tax and emissions fee using isoquant and isocost geometry
Year of publication: |
2019
|
---|---|
Authors: | Decker, Christopher S. |
Published in: |
The American economist : journal of the International Honor Society in Economics, Omicron Delta Epsilon. - London : Sage Publishing, ISSN 2328-1235, ZDB-ID 2068414-9. - Vol. 64.2019, 2, p. 282-292
|
Subject: | emissions fees | Pigovian tax | isoquants and isocost applications | social welfare | Theorie | Theory | Umweltabgabe | Environmental charge | Internalisierung externer Effekte | Internalizing externalities | Luftverschmutzung | Air pollution |
-
How should different countries tax fuels to correct environmental externalities?
Parry, Ian W. H., (2014)
-
Subsidizing non-polluting goods vs. taxing polluting goods for pollution reduction
Main, Robert S., (2013)
-
Optimal emission prices over the business cycles
Lintunen, Jussi, (2021)
- More ...
-
Voluntary environmental investment and responsive regulation
Maxwell, John W., (2006)
-
The composition of industry and the duration of state recessions
Kuhlmann, Angela, (2008)
-
Decker, Christopher S., (2007)
- More ...