Impulse Responses Confidence Intervals for Persistent Data: What Have We Learned?
This paper is a comprehensive comparison of existing methods for constructing confidence bands for univariate impulse response functions in the presence of high persistence. Monte Carlo results show that Kilian (1998a), Wright (2000), Gospodinov (2004), and Pesavento and Rossi (2005) have favorable coverage properties, although they differ in terms of robustness at various horizons, median unbiasedness, and reliability in the possible presence of a unit or mildly explosive root. On the other hand, methods like Runkle's (1987) bootstrap, Andrews and Chen (1994), and regressions in levels or first differences (even when based on pre-tests) may not have accurate coverage properties. The paper makes recommendations as to the appropriateness of each method in empirical work.
Year of publication: |
2006-03
|
---|---|
Authors: | Pesavento, Elena ; Rossi, Barbara |
Institutions: | Department of Economics, Emory University |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Do Technology Shocks Drive Hours Up or Down? A Little Evidence from an Agnostic Procedure
Pesavento, Elena, (2003)
-
Near-optimal Unit Root Test with Stationary Covariate with Better Finite Sample Size
Pesavento, Elena, (2006)
-
Higher Power Tests for Bilateral Failure of PPP after 1973
Elliott, Graham, (2005)
- More ...