Independent Evaluation of IFC's Development Results 2007 : Lessons and Implications from 10 Years of Experience
| Year of publication: |
2007
|
|---|---|
| Authors: | Crabtree, Dan |
| Other Persons: | Hatashima, Hiroyuki (contributor) |
| Publisher: |
Washington, D.C. : International Finance Corp. |
| Description of contents: | Table of Contents [external.dandelon.com] |
Online Resource
| Extent: | 1 online resource (117 pages) |
|---|---|
| Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
| Language: | English |
| Notes: | Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources. Contents; Abbreviations; Acknowledgments; Foreword; Avant-propos; Prólogo; Executive Summary; Résumé analytique; Resumen; IFC Management Response to IEG-IFC; Chairperson's Summary: Committee on Development Effectiveness (CODE); 1 Development Results of IFC-Supported Projects, 1996-2006; Figure 1.1 IFC Has Increased Its Private Investment Operations Sixfold since 1991; Table 1.1 IFC Is More Concentrated Than Other Private Capital in Frontier Countries; Box 1.1 IEG Independently Rates the Development and Investment Performance of IFC Operations Box 1.2 Examples of Successful and Less Successful IFC ProjectsFigure 1.2 IFC Operations Can Help Reduce Poverty through a Chain of Events; Table 1.2 Most IFC-Supported Projects Achieved High Development Ratings, 1996-2006; Figure 1.3 Trends in Project Development Performance, 1996-2006; Figure 1.4 Projects with More High-Risk Factors Achieve Lower Development Ratings; Figure 1.5 Reduced Business Climate Risk Implies Higher Development Ratings in 2007; Figure 1.6 IFC-Supported Projects Show No Trade-off between Development Results and IFC Investment Returns Table 1.3 More Loan Than Equity Operations Achieved High Investment RatingsBox 1.3 IFC Is Deepening Its Development Results Measurement but Methodological Challenges Remain; Box 1.4 IFC and World Bank Development Results Are Generally Not Comparable; Figure 1.7 EBRD and IFC Achieved Similar Development Ratings on One Subindicator; 2 Lessons from 10 Years of Private Sector Development Evaluation; Figure 2.1 Much Riskier Business Climates in Africa, with Some Improvement since 2003; Figure 2.2 Much Lower Private Investment in Africa Than Elsewhere Table 2.1 IFC Success Rates Are Significantly Better Where Country Business Climate Risk Is Improving, or Not DeterioratingFigure 2.3 IFC Development Ratings Varied Considerably by Industry Department; Box 2.1 Examples of IFC Transport Investments in Brazil; Table 2.2 IFC Project Development Results Improve Significantly with the Presence of a High-Quality Sponsor; Table 2.3 Product Market Risk Has a Strong Influence on IFC Project Development Results; Box 2.2 IEG Evaluates IFC Work Quality across Three Underlying Indicators Box 2.3 IFC Faced Considerable Challenges Pursuing Sustainable PSD in AfricaFigure 2.4 Supervision Quality Has Improved since 2001, Reflecting Several Quality Enhancement Steps; Table 2.4 Good Quality Supervision Cannot Compensate Fully for Weak Appraisal Quality; Figure 2.5 IFC Is Increasing Its Provision of Local Currency Financing; Table 2.5 Evaluation Findings Have Provided a Basis for Better IFC Results in Three Main Areas; 3 Strategic Implications for IFC; Figure 3.1 Many Nonfrontier Countries Are as Lacking in Banking Capacity as Frontier Countries Table 3.1 IFC's Financial Sector Development Success Rates Are Lower Where Banking Capacity Is Weak |
| ISBN: | 978-0-8213-7265-4 ; 0-8213-7264-5 ; 978-0-8213-7264-7 ; 978-0-8213-7264-7 |
| Source: | ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW |
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014342904