Institutions and development: the primacy of microanalysis
In recent years, there have been major advances in the empirical analysis of the link between institutions and development. However, a number of methodological problems – both theoretical and empirical – remain unresolved and have been well articulated by Ha-Joon Chang in his article ‘Institutions and Economic Development: Theory, Policy and History’. These problems raise valid concerns about the policy relevance of the evidence arising from the studies. A more reliable approach to study the link between institutions and development and overcome the inherent problems of cross-country empirical analysis is to direct focus to microeconomic analysis of institutions. Such an approach avoids ideologically driven normative judgments about the superiority of particular institutional arrangements and also offers a more credible and tractable avenue to investigate institutional change.
Year of publication: |
2011
|
---|---|
Authors: | KIMENYI, MWANGI S. |
Published in: |
Journal of Institutional Economics. - Cambridge University Press. - Vol. 7.2011, 04, p. 549-553
|
Publisher: |
Cambridge University Press |
Description of contents: | Abstract [journals.cambridge.org] |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Efficiency and Efficacy of Kenya's Constituency Development Fund: Theory and Evidence
Kimenyi, Mwangi S., (2005)
-
Measuring Potential Output and Output Gap and Macroeconomic Policy: The Case of Kenya
Njuguna, Angelica E., (2005)
-
Kimenyi, Mwangi S., (2006)
- More ...