International Economic Agreements and the Constitution
International agreements, such as the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), generally aim to facilitate the free flow of goods and services among nations.1 The U.S. Supreme Court has developed a jurisprudence similarly aiming to facilitate the free flow of goods and services among the several states. That jurisprudence has developed from litigation challenging the constitutionality of state actions on the basis of the Commerce and Supremacy Clauses of the Constitution (art. I, ยง 8, cl. 3, and art. VI, cl. 2). In some subject areas, Commerce Clause decisions closely align with international agreements. In other areas, either or both fall short of achieving economic integration.
Year of publication: |
2000-02
|
---|---|
Authors: | Goodman, Richard M. ; Frost, John M. |
Institutions: | Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics (IIE) |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
International economic agreements and the constitution
Goodman, Richard M., (2000)
-
Chinese participation in the United Nations: The legal imperatives of a negotiated solution
McDougal, Myres S., (1966)
-
Strategies for world order : Chinese participation in the United Nations
Cohen, Jerome Alan, (1971)
- More ...