International Laws of War and the African Child: Norms, Compliance, and Sovereignty
The Convention on the Rights of the Child of 1989 is one of the most prominent international humanitarian treaty in world history. It entered into force quicker than any other treaty and currently only two countries (the United States and Somalia) have not ratified it. Carol Bellamy, Executive Director of UNICEF, says that the Convention has become the centerpiece of a global movement, a movement that reflects a growing awareness of the importance of safeguarding human rights and child rights in particular. Similarly, Lisbet Palme claimed, after travelling to some of the worst conflict zones in Africa, that, For many of the children I have met and talked with, the Convention takes on a very meaningful reality. Yet, during the 1990’s, more children in Africa became victims of, and combatants in, war than at any time in history. Partially as a result, a bitter Human Rights Watch Report assessing the state of children’s rights ten years after the Convention on the Rights of Children came into force was entitled Promises Broken. Indeed, to enhance further international humanitarian law protecting children during war, governments agreed in January 2000, after six years of negotiations, to an Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child that raises the minimum age of combatants to eighteen.
Year of publication: |
2000-05
|
---|---|
Authors: | Herbst, Jeffrey |
Institutions: | Center for Research on Child Wellbeing, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
International Laws of War and the African Child: Norms, Compliance, and Sovereignty
Herbst, Jeffrey, (2000)
-
International Laws of War and the African Child: Norms, Compliance, and Sovereignty
Herbst, Jeffrey, (2000)
-
The politics of revenue sharing in resource-dependent states
Herbst, Jeffrey Ira, (2001)
- More ...