Intrastate peace agreements and the durability of peace
The article debunks the conception that peace agreements are all equal. Distinct from the conventional monocausal assessment, I view the peace agreement as a cohesive whole and evaluate its strength in terms of its structural and procedural provisions. I use data on the length of intrastate peace episodes during the period from 1946 to 2010. My key finding is that the design quality of the peace agreement has a significant impact on the durability of peace. Agreements that are carefully designed to deal with all obstacles to cooperation have the strongest pacifying effect among armed conflict outcomes. The article sets forth ways to sharpen the performance of conflict management operations in war-torn countries.
Year of publication: |
2014
|
---|---|
Authors: | Badran, Ramzi |
Published in: |
Conflict Management and Peace Science. - Peace Science Society (International). - Vol. 31.2014, 2, p. 193-217
|
Publisher: |
Peace Science Society (International) |
Subject: | Conflict management | conflict termination | peace agreement design | peace agreement theory | sustainable peace |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Bargaining and the Interdependent Stages of Civil War Resolution
Findley, Michael G., (2013)
-
Which comes first? Unpacking the relationship between peace agreements and peacekeeping missions
Tiernay, Michael, (2015)
-
Power parity and peace? The role of relative power in civil war settlement
Hultquist, Philip, (2013)
- More ...