Judgment extremity and accuracy under epistemic vs. aleatory uncertainty
Year of publication: |
February 2017
|
---|---|
Authors: | Tannenbaum, David ; Fox, Craig R. ; Ülkümen, Gülden |
Published in: |
Management science : journal of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences. - Catonsville, MD : INFORMS, ISSN 0025-1909, ZDB-ID 206345-1. - Vol. 63.2017, 2, p. 497-518
|
Subject: | probability | uncertainty | judgment | accuracy | forecasting | decision analysis | Theorie | Theory | Entscheidung unter Unsicherheit | Decision under uncertainty | Prognoseverfahren | Forecasting model | Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung | Probability theory |
-
Combining probability forecasts : 60 % and 60 % is 60 %, but likely and likely is very likely
Mislavsky, Robert, (2022)
-
Ranking distributions when only means and variances are known
Müller, Alfred, (2019)
-
Improving accuracy by coherence weighting of direct and ratio probability judgments
Fan, Yuyu, (2019)
- More ...
-
Investment Behaviors Under Epistemic and Aleatory Uncertainty
Walters, Daniel J., (2020)
-
Investor behavior under epistemic vs. aleatory uncertainty
Walters, Daniel J., (2023)
-
Judgment Extremity and Accuracy under Epistemic versus Aleatory Uncertainty
Tannenbaum, David, (2021)
- More ...