Judicial Independence: Why Does De Facto Diverge from De Jure?
Year of publication: |
2021
|
---|---|
Authors: | Hayo, Bernd ; Voigt, Stefan |
Publisher: |
Marburg : Philipps-University Marburg, School of Business and Economics |
Subject: | Judicial independence | constitutional compliance | de jure | de facto | de jure-de facto gap |
Series: | |
---|---|
Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
Type of publication (narrower categories): | Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Other identifiers: | 176058472X [GVK] hdl:10419/234859 [Handle] RePEc:mar:MAGKSE:202105 [RePEc] |
Classification: | H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government ; k38 ; P51 - Comparative Analysis of Economic Systems |
Source: |
-
Judicial independence : why does de facto diverge from de jure?
Hayo, Bernd, (2021)
-
Militant constitutionalism: a promising concept to make constitutional backsliding less likely?
Gutmann, Jerg, (2021)
-
Militant Constitutionalism – A Promising Concept to Make Constitutional Backsliding less likely?
Gutmann, Jerg, (2019)
- More ...
-
Explaining constitutional change: The case of judicial independence
Hayo, Bernd, (2012)
-
The relevance of judicial procedure for economic growth
Hayo, Bernd, (2008)
-
The puzzling long-term relationship between de jure and de facto judicial independence
Hayo, Bernd, (2018)
- More ...