Keynes, Lucas and involuntary unemployment: a reply to Hayes
In this response to Mark Hayes's criticism of his article, 'Lucas on involuntary unemployment', the author insists on the need to draw a distinction between labour rationing (a market outcome) and unemployment (the activity of job seeking). Economic theory is mainly concerned with the former. Yet the issue of the voluntarity versus the involuntarity of unemployment pertains to unemployment as an activity. Failing to make this distinction cannot but lead to semantic confusion. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.
Year of publication: |
2006
|
---|---|
Authors: | Vroey, Michel De |
Published in: |
Cambridge Journal of Economics. - Oxford University Press. - Vol. 30.2006, 3, p. 479-482
|
Publisher: |
Oxford University Press |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Involuntary unemployment : the missing piece in Keynes's General theory
De Vroey, Michel, (1994)
-
Does labour market rationing entail (involuntary) unemployment?
De Vroey, Michel, (1994)
-
Involuntary unemployment : unravelling the conceptual muddles
De Vroey, Michel, (1994)
- More ...