Law Reviews and Academic Debate

The author argues that, if a legal journal publishes a response to one of its own articles, it has the obligation to let the original author respond to the critic, even if only briefly. If that doesn't happen, it looks as though the journal is accepting the critic's views as the final word on the subject. (This essay was the result of the author's unhappy experience with one high profile journal.)

MoreLess

Year of publication:	2009
Authors:	Jensen, Erik M.
Publisher:	[2009]: [S.l.] : SSRN
Subject:	Bibliometrie \| Bibliometrics

freely available

Full text |

More access options

Check Google Scholar

In German libraries (KVK)

I need help

More details
Report error

Extent:	1 Online-Ressource (7 p)
Type of publication:	Book / Working Paper
Language:	English
Notes:	In: Washington Law Review, Vol. 77, p. 769, 2002
Classification:	K49 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior. Other
Source:	ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013160231