Linking Revealed and Stated Preferences to Test External Validity
A new approach is under way for the research agenda of environmental valuation. Rather than treating stated preference (SP) and revealed preference (RP) as competing valuation techniques, analysts have started to view them as complementary, where the strengths of each approach can be used to provide more precise and possibly more accurate benefit estimates. In this study, the authors reexamine the models and motives for combining SP and RP data. They also reconsider the interpretation of "consistent" or "inconsistent" findings of RP and SP data.
Year of publication: |
1999-05
|
---|---|
Authors: | Kling, Catherine Louise ; Herriges, Joseph A. ; Azevedo, Christopher D. |
Institutions: | Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD), Iowa State University |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Valuing Preservation and Improvements of Water Quality in Clear Lake
Kling, Catherine Louise, (2001)
-
Iowa Wetlands: Perceptions and Values
Kling, Catherine Louise, (2000)
-
Ask a Hypothetical Question, Get a Valuable Answer?
Kling, Catherine Louise, (2000)
- More ...