Lobbying Legislatures.
We analyze informational lobbying in the context of multi-member legislatures. We show that a single decision maker and a decentralized majoritarian legislature provide widely different incentives for interest groups to acquire and transmit policy relevant information. The paper also shows a difference in the opportunity to affect policy through lobbying between a parliamentary legislature and a legislature low voting cohesion, such as the U.S. Congress. We show that the incentives to lobby a parliamentary legislature are much lower than to lobby Congress. The results provide a rationale for why lobby groups are more active in the U.S. Congress. The key institutional feature to explain the different behavior of lobby groups is the vote of confidence procedure, which creates voting cohesion in a parliamentary system across policy issues. We show that the flexibility of creating majorities in the Congress creates an incentive for interest groups to play an active role in the design of policy in the congressional system, while the voting cohesion in the parliamentary system dissuades interest group's incentive to engage in information provision.
Year of publication: |
2000-06
|
---|---|
Authors: | Bennedsen, Morten ; Feldmann, Sven E. |
Institutions: | Centre for Industrial Economics (CIE), Økonomisk Institut |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Informational Lobbying and Political Contributions.
Bennedsen, Morten, (2000)
-
The Balance of Power in Close Corporations
Bennedsen, Morten, (1998)
-
Outsourcing, Market Structure and Elections.
Bennedsen, Morten, (2003)
- More ...