Market Valuation and Equity Ownership Structure: The Case of Agency Conflict Regimes.
This paper provides further evidence on the link between the firm's performance and the distribution of the common shares between insiders, blockholders and institutions. We endogenize the functional form of the market value--common equity structure relationship by using a switching regression methodology. This allows us to observe four distinct ownership structure types that constitute different agency conflict regimes. We provide evidence that supports the notion that investors recognize the existence of such regimes and assess market values differently depending on the type of agency regime the firm operates in. We find that firms with low insider stakes and low blockholder stakes and firms with high insider stakes and high blockholder stakes have the highest agency costs of free cash flow. We also find that the effect of the ownership variables on market values differs across regimes and that there are differences in the monitoring effectiveness of institutional holders and blockholders. Copyright 1998 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
Year of publication: |
1998
|
---|---|
Authors: | Pantzalis, Christos ; Kim, Chansog Francis ; Kim, Sungsoo |
Published in: |
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. - Springer. - Vol. 11.1998, 3, p. 249-68
|
Publisher: |
Springer |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Divergence of opinion and equity returns
Doukas, John A., (2006)
-
Financial sector diversification and MNC valuation
Kim, Chansog Francis, (2009)
-
Do family owners use firm hedging policy to hedge personal undiversified wealth risk?
Kim, Chansog, (2014)
- More ...