Marshall or Jacobs? Answers to an unsuitable question from an interaction model
This paper investigates whether localization economies as brought forward by Marshall(1890) or urbanization economies as mentioned by Jacobs (1970) are more decisive forregional gross value added per capita. Our novel approach is to explicitly allow forinterdependencies between these two theories and to take into account that the initiallevels of specialization and diversification might play a role. We therefore deploy amodel with interaction terms and find that these two theories are not mutually exclusivein most of our sectors. In addition, the empirical results show that the initial levels ofspecialization and diversification do matter as well.
Year of publication: |
2012
|
---|---|
Authors: | Kluge, Jan ; Lehmann, Robert |
Institutions: | ifo Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München e.V. |
Subject: | Localization and urbanization economies | interaction models | regional gross valued added |
Saved in:
freely available
Extent: | application/pdf |
---|---|
Series: | |
Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Notes: | Number ifo Working Paper No. 124 |
Classification: | C33 - Models with Panel Data ; O18 - Regional, Urban, and Rural Analyses ; O40 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity. General ; R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, and Changes |
Source: |
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009645680
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Marshall or Jacobs? Answers to an unsuitable question from an interaction model
Lehmann, Robert, (2012)
-
Marshall or Jacobs? Answers to an unsuitable question from an interaction model
Kluge, Jan, (2012)
-
Marshall or Jacobs? : answers to an unsuitable question from an interaction model
Lehmann, Robert, (2012)
- More ...
Similar items by person