Mostly Calibrated
Prequential testing of a forecaster is known to be manipulable if the test must pass an informed forecaster for all possible true distributions. Stewart (2011) provides a non-manipulable prequential likelihood test that only fails an informed forecaster on a small, category I, set of distributions. We present a prequential test based on calibration that also fails the informed forecaster on at most a category I set of true distributions and is non-manipulable. Our construction sheds light on the relationship between likelihood and calibration with respect to the distributions they reject.
Year of publication: |
2011-12
|
---|---|
Authors: | Feinberg, Yossi ; Lambert, Nicolas S. |
Institutions: | Graduate School of Business, Stanford University |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Auctions for Social Lending: A Theoretical Analysis
Chen, Ning, (2011)
-
Dynamically Eliciting Unobservable Information
Chambers, Christopher P., (2014)
-
Feinberg, Yossi, (2012)
- More ...