Myths of Regional Politics: Siberian “Separatism”
The paper states the fact that the Federal Center is attempting to frame bonds with regions into vertical power structure. The bureaucratic politics model and the monopolized Russian business lead to actual decline of competence and financial base of regional self-development, which casts doubt on the fundamental principles of federalism. First and foremost, this situation infringes upon interests of Siberia and Far East, but in the end it contradicts with nationwide Russian ones. The Center may be concerned with a fictitious threat of “Siberian separatism” which has a long history. Still, nowadays, for Russia to retain eastern territories it does not need an administrative resource but an actual economic integration and reindustrialization of Siberia. It is only economically developed Siberia that is able to “increase Russia’s might”
Year of publication: |
2014
|
---|---|
Authors: | Shmat, V.V. |
Published in: |
Journal "Region: Economics and Sociology". - Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of Siberian Branch of RAS. - Vol. 2.2014
|
Publisher: |
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of Siberian Branch of RAS |
Subject: | Siberia | Far East | region | socio-economic development | separatism | regionalism | federalism | integration |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Wulf, Herbert, (2014)
-
Pawns take queen : the destabilizing effects of regional parties in Europe
Brancati, Dawn, (2005)
-
Assessing potential Russian irredentism and separatism in Kazakhstan's northern oblasts
Diener, Alexander C., (2015)
- More ...
Similar items by person