Neither Lausanne nor Cambridge: Pantaleoni and the missing boundary between economics and sociology
By the turn of the twentieth century, Lausanne and Cambridge were the centres of diffusion of two rival versions of marginalism. This paper focuses on the position of Maffeo Pantaleoni, a leading figure of the late nineteenth century 'renaissance' of Italian political economy, with respect to the eminent representatives of the two schools: Pareto and Marshall. Pantaleoni's position is examined with reference to the two main bones of contention between Pareto and Marshall, namely general as opposed to partial equilibrium, and pure as opposed to mixed economics.
Year of publication: |
2014
|
---|---|
Authors: | Dardi, Marco |
Published in: |
The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 0967-2567. - Vol. 21.2014, 3, p. 485-519
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Il giovane Marshall: accumulazione e mercato
Dardi, Marco, (1984)
-
Dardi, Marco, (2006)
-
Utilitarianism without utility : a missed opportunity in Alfred Marshall's theory of market choice
Dardi, Marco, (2008)
- More ...