Obtaining Support for Eradication Programs Using a Common Ethical Language
When determining whether or not to move forward with an eradication program, the question of possible success must be raised. Successful campaigns often need support from the public and governmental institutions, but different stakeholders may highlight different concerns when an eradication program is proposed. In what follows, the author argues that using a common ethical language when discussing particularly divisive programs with the public can help garner support for those programs. More specifically, utilizing utilitarian theory can play a valuable role in obtaining public support for eradication programs involving appealing animals.
Year of publication: |
2018
|
---|---|
Authors: | Brewer, Cameron David |
Published in: |
International Journal of Technoethics (IJT). - IGI Global, ISSN 1947-346X, ZDB-ID 2703845-2. - Vol. 9.2018, 2 (01.07.), p. 15-25
|
Publisher: |
IGI Global |
Subject: | Animal Rights | Animal Welfare | Appealing Animals | Biocentrism | Eradication | Ethical Theory | Inherent Value | Invasive Alien Species | Utilitarianism |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Espinosa, Romain, (2024)
-
Animal welfare : antispeciesism, veganism and a "life worth living"
Espinosa, Romain, (2021)
-
Public health ethics and more-than-human solidarity
Rock, Melanie J., (2015)
- More ...