Order Submission Strategy and the Curious Case of Marketable Limit Orders
We provide empirical evidence on order submission strategy of investors with similar commitments to trade by comparing the execution costs of market orders and marketable limit orders (i.e., limit orders with the same trading priority as market orders). The results indicate the unconditional trading costs of marketable limit orders are significantly greater than market orders. We attribute the difference in costs to a selection bias and provide evidence suggesting the order submission strategy decision is based on prevailing market conditions and stock characteristics. After correcting for the selection bias, the results show the average trader chooses the order type with lower conditional trading costs.
Year of publication: |
2002
|
---|---|
Authors: | Peterson, Mark ; Sirri, Erik |
Published in: |
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. - Cambridge University Press. - Vol. 37.2002, 02, p. 221-241
|
Publisher: |
Cambridge University Press |
Description of contents: | Abstract [journals.cambridge.org] |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Evaluation of the biases in execution cost estimation using trade and quote data
Peterson, Mark, (2003)
-
Evaluation of the biases in execution cost estimation using trade and quote data
Peterson, Mark A., (2003)
-
Order preferencing and market quality on US equity exchanges
Peterson, Mark A., (2003)
- More ...