Outlook vs. Futures: Three Decades of Evidence in Hog and Cattle Markets
The accuracy of hog and cattle price forecasts from four outlook programs is compared with forecasts derived from futures markets. Most of the series begin in the mid to late 1970s and end in 2007. Root mean squared error (RMSE) comparisons indicate the difference between outlook and futures RMSE is relatively small in most cases. In directional terms, outlook forecasts beat futures prices only 2 out of 11 times in hogs, and 1 out of 7 times in cattle. However, the null hypothesis that futures encompasses outlook is rejected in 5 of 11 cases for hogs, and 4 of 7 cases for cattle. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | Colino, Evelyn V. ; Irwin, Scott H. |
Published in: |
American Journal of Agricultural Economics. - Agricultural and Applied Economics Association - AAEA. - Vol. 92.2010, 1, p. 1-15
|
Publisher: |
Agricultural and Applied Economics Association - AAEA |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Outlook vs. Futures: Three Decades of Evidence in Hog and Cattle Markets
Colino, Evelyn V., (2007)
-
How Much Can Outlook Forecasts be Improved? An Application to the U.S. Hog Market
Colino, Evelyn V., (2008)
-
Do Composite Procedures Really Improve the Accuracy of Outlook Forecasts?
Colino, Evelyn V., (2009)
- More ...