Ownership structure and the separation of voting and cash flow rights-evidence from Switzerland
This article analyses the relation between a firm's equity capital structure, managerial and outside block ownership, and firm value based on a unique and hand-collected sample of 545 observations on 174 Swiss firms over the period from 2002 to 2005. While previous papers concentrate either on managerial ownership or on blockholdings, which can, but need not be, managerial, this article distinguishes between the two and investigates their relative importance. This distinction turns out to be important. I find the probability that a firm has a dual-class structure to be positively related to managerial ownership, the ownership of the single largest shareholder, and inside blockholders more generally while negatively related to the ownership of 'true' outside blockholders such as listed companies, mutual and pension funds. Moreover, I present strong evidence that the aim of the dual-class structure is to secure the largest shareholder's and, more specifically, inside blockholders' control over the firm. Most importantly, I find evidence that these inside controlling shareholders take advantage of the dual-class structure by extracting private benefits of control.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Schmid, Markus |
Published in: |
Applied Financial Economics. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 0960-3107. - Vol. 19.2009, 18, p. 1453-1476
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Is Board Industry Experience a Corporate Governance Mechanism?
Drobetz, Wolfgang, (2014)
-
Don’t Answer the Phone – Financial Advice and Individual Investors’ Performance
Hoechle, Daniel, (2014)
-
Smokescreen: How Managers Behave When They Have Something to Hide
Artiga González, Tanja, (2013)
- More ...