Paying to Improve Your Chances: Gambling or Insurance?
Will a more risk-averse individual spend more or less to improve probabilities, say on marketing efforts that enhance the chance of a sale? For any two payoffs and starting probabilities, the answer is unfortunately indeterminate. However, interpreting gambling as increasing small chances of good outcomes and insurance as reducing small chances of bad outcomes, the more risk-averse individual will pay less (more) to gamble (insure). The authors find a critical "switching probability that depends on the individuals and outcomes involved. If the good outcome is less (more) likely than this critical value, the expenditures represent gambling (insurance). Copyright 1991 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
Year of publication: |
1991
|
---|---|
Authors: | McGuire, Martin C ; Pratt, John ; Zeckhauser, Richard |
Published in: |
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. - Springer. - Vol. 4.1991, 4, p. 329-38
|
Publisher: |
Springer |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Principals and agents : an overview
Pratt, John W., (1985)
-
Paying to improve your chances : gambling or insurance?
McGuire, Martin C., (1991)
-
Multidimensional bargains and the desirability of ex post inefficiency
Pratt, John W., (1992)
- More ...