- GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS
- PREFACE
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- MAIN REPORT
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 1.1. Objectives
- 1.2. Background and Context
- 1.3. Evaluation Questions
- 1.4. Sources of evidence and sample project database
- 1.5. Limitations affecting the evaluation
- 2. STRATEGY, IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTS
- 2.1. Assistance followed pre-accession strategy closely but was hampered by weak design
- 2.2. Coverage of the components of the environment acquis was not well balanced
- 2.3. Cost-effectiveness improved with time but was hampered by inefficient procedures
- 2.4. Considerable catalytic effect with both ISPA and other donor funds
- 2.5. Assistance was a successful agent for change, but wider impact was limited
- 2.6. A good basis for sustainability was established
- 2.7. Positive but moderate contribution to economic and social cohesion
- 2.8. Assistance supported Environmental Policy Integration indirectly
- 2.9. Phare assistance has generally performed well but there is still much to do
- 3. CONCLUSIONS, LESSONS LEARNED AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- 3.1. Conclusions
- 3.2. Recommendations
- 3.3. Lessons learned
- ANNEXES
- Annex 1. Terms of Reference
- Annex 2. Distribution of Phare environment funding by country and by
- Annex 3. Phare environment projects in database
- Annex 4. Environmental expenditure in the public sector
- Annex 5. Typical Phare environment outputs
- Annex 6. May 2006 Monitoring Reports on Bulgaria and Romania
- Annex 7. World Bank Indicators 2005 – Environment Government Commitment
- Annex 8. List of Documents
- Annex 9. List of Interviews
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011476799