Planning for the Census in the Year 2000
Considering the difficulties, the Census Bureau does a remarkably good job at counting people. There are two current techniques for evaluating or adjusting the census: (a) demographic analysis uses administrative records to make independent population estimates, which can be compared to census counts; (b) datafrom an independent sample survey can be used to estimate population coverage. If there is a large undercount, these techniques may be accurate enough for adjustment. With a small undercount, it is unlikely that current adjustment methodologies can improve on the census; instead, adjustment could easily degrade the accuracy of the data. This article reviews plans for Census 2000, including proposals for adjustment, in the light of past experience.
Year of publication: |
1996
|
---|---|
Authors: | Freedman, David A. ; Wachter, Kenneth W. |
Published in: |
Evaluation Review. - Vol. 20.1996, 4, p. 355-377
|
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Measuring Local Heterogeneity with 1990 U.S. Census Data
Wachter, Kenneth W., (2000)
-
Adjusting the U.S. Census of 1990
Functions, Loss, (1994)
-
Wachter, Kenneth W., (2000)
- More ...