We present a three-fold test for sustainability on policies addressing environmental and natural resource management. The first — <i>ecological holism</i> — requires that management of natural systems not only ensure the long term viability of ecosystem functions and enhanced diversity of wildlife within that ecosystem, but also facilitate the provision of renewable energy and material resources. The second — <i>community centeredness</i> — is an assessment of the improvement (or reduction) in economic wellbeing of local populations measured by employment and income and in quality of life for the larger community resulting from that policy. The third — <i>institutional legitimacy</i> — evaluates the level of justice that a policy and its outcome(s) bring to the entire community (here, just policies will satisfy Rawls's "veil of ignorance" test). Three policies for National Forest management on Washington's Olympic Peninsula are examined and results are compared: the <i>Northwest Forest Plan</i>, the <i>Wild Olympics Wilderness and Scenic Rivers Act of 2012</i> (<i>Wild Olympics</i>), and <i>The Third Way</i> (an alternative forest management option). Each policy satisfies the first test of ecological holism, but not in equal measures. Success in this regard can be differentially ranked because the relative impacts are not neutral. Both the <i>Northwest Forest Plan</i> and <i>Wild Olympics</i> fail the test of community centeredness. In contrast, <i>The Third Way</i> promotes community centeredness and ecological holism. We assert that, as a result, it would satisfy John Rawls's test for justice, and it is institutionally legitimate.
