Privilege-seeking activities in organizational politics and its effect on more productive employees

The ability to accurately evaluate an employee would seem to be a key activity in managing Information Technology (IT). Yet, workers may engage in dishonest and misleading behavior, which distort the evaluation, a variation of organizational politics. Why would they do so? One hypothesis is that "privilege-seeking", that is, managing one's managers (also called "rentseeking", "management relations", or "organizational politics"), can be used by a worker to misrepresent his actual contribution. These activities lead to a reduction in productivity and consequently to a loss of profits. Management may decrease the firm's losses by engaging in costly monitoring activities. It is paradoxical that a behavior with such negative consequences is tolerated. A model is developed to show that an organization should be composed of employees with different levels of productivity; moreover, it may be optimal for the organization to have some employees who are good at privilege-seeking activities, forcing the remaining workers to invest in productive activities. This contradicts existing theory that unequal compensation should be less motivating and the remaining workers less productive. -- Employee evaluation ; equity theory ; influence costs ; management relations ; multiple agent model ; monitoring ; Nash equilibrium ; privilege-seeking activities ; rent ; rent-seeking