Productivity or Endowments? Sectoral Evidence for Hong Kong's Aggregate Growth <link rid="fn100">*</link>
The present paper provides sectoral evidence that sheds new light on the current debate regarding the sources of growth of the East Asian miracle. We test both the productivity-driven and endowment-driven hypotheses using Hong Kong's sectoral data. The results show that most of the growth of the service sector is driven by rapidly-accumulating capital endowments, and not by productivity growth. In addition, productivity growth in the manufacturing sector is unimpressive. The manufacturing sector is revealed to be more labor intensive than the service sector and its growth is hindered by the reallocation of resources into the service sector as a result of the growth of capital endowments and imports. Overall, sectoral evidence supports the endowment-driven hypothesis. Copyright 2005 East Asian Economic Association..
Year of publication: |
2005
|
---|---|
Authors: | Kee, Hiau Looi |
Published in: |
Asian Economic Journal. - East Asian Economic Association - EAEA. - Vol. 19.2005, 1, p. 51-81
|
Publisher: |
East Asian Economic Association - EAEA |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Local Intermediate Inputs and the Shared Supplier Spillovers of Foreign Direct Investment
Kee, Hiau Looi, (2014)
-
Domestic Value Added in Exports : Theory and Firm Evidence from China
Kee, Hiau Looi, (2015)
-
Short-Term Impact of Brexit on the United Kingdom's Export of Goods
Kee, Hiau Looi, (2017)
- More ...