Psychology and Economics.
Because psychology systematically explores human judgment, behavior, and well-being, it can teach us important facts about how humans differ from traditional economic assumptions. In this essay I discuss a selection of psychological findings relevant to economics. Standard economics assumes that each person has stable, well-defined preferences, and that she rationally maximizes those preferences. Section 2 considers what psychological research teaches us about the true form of preferences, allowing us to make economics more realistic within the rational-choice framework. Section 3 reviews research on biases in judgment under uncertainty; because those biases lead people to make systematic errors in their attempts to maximize their preferences, thi s research poses a more radical challenge to the economics model. The array of psychological findings reviewed in Section 4 points to an even more radical critique of the economics model: Even if we are willing to modify our familiar assumptions about p references, or allow that people make systematic errors in their attempts to maximize those preferences, it is sometimes misleading to conceptualize people as attempting to maximize well-defined coherent, or stable preferences.
Year of publication: |
1997-01-01
|
---|---|
Authors: | Matthew Rabin. |
Institutions: | Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Risk Aversion and Expected-Utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem.
Matthew Rabin., (2000)
-
Matthew Rabin., (1997)
-
Cognitive Dissonance and Social Change.
Matthew Rabin., (1991)
- More ...