Public Happiness in Japan : A Qualitative Approach

Could contemporary urban Japan provide a living example of the 18th Century Italian notion of public happiness? The question is by no means far-fetched. Daily life in Japan is rich in examples of "public happiness," as shown here through a number of anecdotes and examples. Yet Japan's performance is mediocre under the usual subjective and "capabilities"/eudaemonia-type metrics of well-being. This talk proposes that public happiness ought to be considered a third, collective type of “happiness” that complements the usual, more individually-based conceptions. While public happiness doesn’t necessarily arise from government policies, it certainly can be impaired by them. The failure of metrics to detect public happiness in Japan suggests that qualitative principles might be better at protecting and promoting it. An historical example of how a local government intervened in a traditional festival illustrates how qualitative considerations can enhance public happiness in practice. The article concludes by proposing a group of six qualitative "design principles" as candidate heuristics for policy-makers, among other actors