Ranking Accounting Authors and Departments in Accounting Education : Different Methodologies – Significantly Different Results

This research tests whether Holderness et al.'s (2014) accounting-education rankings are sensitive to a change in the set of journals used. It provides updated rankings for accounting-education authors from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the Republic of Ireland, the United Kingdom, and the United States using a sample that included the publications in 13 accounting-education journals. Our analysis indicated that Holderness et al.'s rankings of authors and departments were significantly different from our rankings. This research provides rankings of the top 50 authors and departments for three periods: 2010 to 2015, 2004 to 2015 and 1992 to 2015. We provide data indicating the distribution of authors for these periods to assist authors not listed in the most-prolific lists in determining their relative ranking. Finally, we provide data on the distribution of journal choices for accounting-education publications for the authors from each country