Regime‐switching in stock index and Treasury futures returns and measures of stock market stress
We investigate bivariate regime‐switching in daily futures‐contract returns for the US stock index and ten‐year Treasury notes over the crisis‐rich 1997–2005 period. We allow the return means, volatilities, and correlation to all vary across regimes. We document a striking contrast between regimes, with a high‐stress regime that exhibits a much higher stock volatility, a much lower stock–bond correlation, and a higher mean bond return. The high‐stress regime is associated with higher average values of stock‐implied volatility, stock illiquidity, and stock and bond futures trading volume. The lagged implied volatility from equity‐index options is useful in modeling the time‐varying transition probabilities of the regime‐switching process. Our findings support the notions that: (1) stock market stress can have a material influence on Treasury bond pricing, and (2) the diversification benefits of combined stock–bond holdings tend to be greater during times with relatively high stock market stress. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 30:753–779, 2010
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | Bansal, Naresh ; Connolly, Robert A. ; Stivers, Chris |
Published in: |
Journal of Futures Markets. - John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.. - Vol. 30.2010, 8, p. 753-779
|
Publisher: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Regime-switsching in stock index and treasury futures returns and measures of stock market stress
Bansal, Naresh K., (2010)
-
The stock-bond return return relation, the term structure's slope, and asset-class risk dynamics
Bansal, Naresh K., (2014)
-
Equity volatility as a determinant of future term-structure volatility
Bansal, Naresh K., (2015)
- More ...