Rethinking agricultural research roles
An examination of the role ofUniversity weed scientists in herbicide efficacyresearch and long-term weed management studies raisesseveral important questions: who should do what kindof research and what kind of research should be done,and, because the university is a research institutionfunded by the public, there is also the importantquestion of who should pay for the research. Indeveloping a response to these questions, severaldimensions of the relationships within which weedscience works must be considered. The author‘sexperience has demonstrated that production, thedominant value in agriculture, provides a sufficientanswer to the questions for many in weed science.However, when weed scientists claim credit forexcellence in production they must also acceptsociety‘s right to hold them responsible for problemsthey now treat as externalities. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998
Year of publication: |
1998
|
---|---|
Authors: | Zimdahl, Robert |
Published in: |
Agriculture and Human Values. - Springer, ISSN 0889-048X. - Vol. 15.1998, 1, p. 77-84
|
Publisher: |
Springer |
Subject: | Agriculture | Ethics | Externalities | Herbicide efficacy | Production | Research | Weed management | Weedscience |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Using a choice experiment to improve decision support tool design
Kragt, M. E., (2014)
-
Using choice experiments to improve the design of weed decision support tools
Kragt, Marit Ellen, (2013)
-
Fleets of robots for precision agriculture: a simulation environment
Emmi, Luis, (2013)
- More ...