Extent:
Online-Ressource (295 p)
Series:
Type of publication: Book / Working Paper
Language: English
Notes:
Description based upon print version of record
Cover; Contents; Foreword; Acknowledgments; About the Authors; Abbreviations; Introduction; Overview; Boxes; 0.1 Key Features of MGNREGS; The Bihar Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme; Figures; 0.1 Bihar Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme Flowchart; Tables; 0.1 Summary Statistics on the Bihar Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme from Administrative Data; This Study; Main Lessons from the Study; Notes; References; 1 Does India's Employment Guarantee Scheme Guarantee Employment?; Why an Employment Guarantee Need Not Be Attainable; 1.1 Effect of Local-Level Costs on Meeting Demand under MGNREGS
1.2 Corruption and the Unmet Demand for WorkPerformance in Meeting the Demand for Work across States; 1.1 Summary MGNREGS Statistics, 2009/10; 1.1 There Is No Correlation between Participation Rates in MGNREGS and the Incidence of Poverty across Indian States; 1.2 Program Expenditure per Capita across States; 1.2 Demand for MGNREGS Work Is Greater in Poorer States; 1.3 Poorer States Have Greater Unmet Demand for Work on MGNREGS; 1.4 There Is Less Rationing at the Margin Than on Average across States; Targeting; 1.3 Coverage of MGNREGS across Consumption Quintiles, 2009/10
1.5 Participation and Rationing by Consumption per Person, Rural India1.4 Targeting Performance of MGNREGS across States; 1.6 Targeting Performance Rises with the Overall Participation Rate across States; Wages and Rationing on MGNREGS; 1.5 Participation Rates and Targeting by Social Group; 1.7 Participation Rates for Scheduled Tribes, Scheduled Castes, and Other Backward Classes Rise Faster Than That for "Other" Castes as the Overall Participation Rate Increases across States; 1.6 Average Wages on MGNREGS and in Casual Labor, 2009/10; Participation by Women
1.8 Women Get a Larger Share of MGNREGS Work Than of Casual Wage Labor across States1.9 The Share of Work Going to Women Tends to Be Lower in Poorer States; Conclusion; 1.10 The Share of Work Going to Women Tends to Be Lower in States with Higher Rationing; 1.7 Regression Results for Female Share of Employment in MGNREGS; Notes; References; 2 Unmet Demand for Work on the Bihar Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme; The BREGS Survey; 2.1 Sample Sizes in Bihar Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme Survey; Performance in Meeting Demand for Work; 2.2 Summary of Participation, Demand, and Rationing
2.3 Joint Distribution of Program Participation across the Two Survey Rounds2.4 Days of Employment Provided and Demanded in the Past Year; 2.5 Household Perceptions about Why They Were Rationed; Annex 2A; 2A.1 Distribution of Households and Individuals across Strata (Round 1); 2A.2 Sample Size (Rounds 1 and 2); 2A.3 Variable Definitions; Notes; References; 3 Who Gets Work? Who Is Left Out?; 3.1 Characteristics of Participants, Excess Demanders, and the Rest, Round 1; Targeting; 3.2 Coverage of Bihar Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme across Consumption Quintiles of Rural Bihar
3.3 Coverage of the Bihar Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme across Social Groups of Rural Bihar
ISBN: 978-1-4648-0130-3 ; 978-1-4648-0131-0
Other identifiers:
hdl:10986/17195 [Handle]
Source:
ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012550469