Rita, Claiborne, and the Courts of Appeals' Attachment to the Sentencing Guidelines

This article provides a critical assessment of the work of the courts of appeals when conducting reasonableness review after United States v. Booker. It examines the presumption of reasonableness most circuits have afforded to within-Guidelines sentences and the requirement that a variance from the Guidelines be supported by a justification proportionate to the variance

MoreLess

Year of publication:	[2007]
Authors:	Hessick, Carissa Byrne
Other Persons:	Hessick, F. Andrew (contributor)
Publisher:	[2007]: [S.l.] : SSRN

freely available

Full text |

More access options

Check Google Scholar

In German libraries (KVK)

I need help

Extent:	1 Online-Ressource (18 p)
Type of publication:	Book / Working Paper
Notes:	In: Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2007
Source:	ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012777440