Self-reporting in Optimal Law Enforcement when there are Criminal Teams
We extend the analysis of self-reporting schemes to criminal teams. When the violators behave non-cooperatively, maximum deterrence can be reached at virtually no cost by designing a prisoners' dilemma. One drawback of such a scheme is that it might induce cooperative behaviour in the self-reporting stage. If the cooperation rate is increasing the benefits from cooperation, it is optimal to impose less than the maximum fine if both individuals self-report. The same result occurs for imperfect self-reporting technologies where the conviction of one agent does not necessarily lead to a conviction of his accomplice. Copyright (c) The London School of Economics and Political Science 2004.
| Year of publication: |
2004
|
|---|---|
| Authors: | Feess, Eberhard ; Walzl, Markus |
| Published in: |
Economica. - London School of Economics (LSE). - Vol. 71.2004, 283, p. 333-348
|
| Publisher: |
London School of Economics (LSE) |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
When Bidding More is Not Enough: All-Pay Auctions with Handicaps
Feess, Eberhard, (2002)
-
Incentive schemes, private information and the double-edged role of competition for agents
Bannier, Christina, (2016)
-
Differentiation and Risk-Aversion in Imperfectly Competitive Labor Markets
Bannier, Christina E., (2020)
- More ...