• PREFACE
  • SUMMARY
  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
  • 1. INTRODUCTION
  • 1.1. Purpose of the study
  • 1.2. Scope of the study
  • 1.3. Other recent work in this field
  • 2. OVERVIEW OF STUDY APPROACH
  • 2.1. Overview of study approach
  • 2.2. Limitations of the study
  • 3. APPLYING THE DEFINITION OF ACS
  • 4. FINDINGS ABOUT ACS AVAILABLE IN MEMBER STATES
  • 4.1. Types of ACS reported
  • 4.2. Treatment as a main component or condition
  • 14.3. Types of treatment available
  • 4.4. Introduction dates of ACS
  • 4.5. Scope of geographic application
  • 4.6. Professionals who offer ACS, professionals delivering ACS and setting in which ACS can be applied
  • 4.7. Who pays for the treatment provided under ACS?
  • 4.8. Type of offences and offenders for which ACS can be used
  • 4.9. Minimum and maximum length of ACS imposed
  • 4.10. What happens when offenders do not comply with the conditions of ACS imposed?
  • 5. STATISTICS ON THE USE OF ACS
  • 5.1. Collecting statistics on ACS
  • 5.2. Overview of ACS for which data were provided
  • 5.3. Case studies on statistics regarding use in practice
  • 6. THEMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF ACS IN PRACTICE
  • 6.1. Frequency of use of ACS in practice
  • 6.2. Reasons why ACS were and were not used in practice
  • 7. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL LITERATURE
  • 7.1. Scope and objective: updating recently-conducted reviews
  • 7.2. Evidence on effectiveness
  • 7.3. Effectiveness of ACS in reducing reoffending
  • 7.4. Effectiveness of ACS in reducing drug use
  • 7.5. Effectiveness of ACS in improving other outcomes
  • 7.6. Effectiveness of drug courts
  • 7.7. Evidence of factors enhancing the effectiveness of ACS
  • 7.8. Limitations and challenges for the evidence base on ACS
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011799438