- PART I: METHODOLOGY
- 1 ASSIGNMENT COLLECTING DATA
- 1.1 The Research Team in charge of collecting information
- 1.2 Determination of relevant information to implement Assignment 1
- 1.2.1 Social and economic perspective
- 1.2.2 Data collection procedures - Identification and confirmation of data sources
- 1.2.3 Transparency of costs and reimbursement
- 1.3 Regulation of the costs of justice
- 1.3.1 Regulation by category
- 1.3.2 Type of fee regulation
- 2 Proceeding fees
- 2.1 Fees for judicial proceedings
- 2.1.1 Introduction
- 2.1.2 Allocation of proceeding fees: the example of Greece
- 2.1.3 Amount of proceeding fees
- 2.1.4 How are the fees determined?
- 2.1.5 Date and means of payment
- 2.1.6 Exemptions
- 2.1.7 Simplifying: main objective of the latest reforms
- 2.2 Appeal fees
- 2.3 E-justice
- 2.3.1 Introduction
- 2.3.2 Online proceedings, not much used
- 2.3.3 The possibility to communicate with courts via internet is being developed in many Member States
- 2.3.4 Online consultation of official documents or acts
- 2.3.5 Claim filing by electronic means
- 2.3.6 Video-conferencing during hearings
- 2.3.7 Conclusion
- 2.4 Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- 2.4.1 Introduction
- 2.4.2 Types of ADR
- 2.4.3 Recourse to ADR according to the nature of the dispute
- 2.4.4 Choosing the ADR before the litigation takes place
- 2.4.5 Determination of the fees
- 3 LAWYERS’ FEES
- 3.1 The schedules
- 3.1.1 The schedules setting a minimum and / or a maximum: Italy and Greece
- 3.1.2 Schedules fixing part of lawyers’ fees
- 3.1.3 The rates applicable in where the contract terms remain silent
- 3.2 Supervision of fees by general rules
- 3.3 Success fees
- 3.4 The reimbursement of lawyers’ fees
- 3.4.1 The fixing of a minimum and / or a maximum based on the financial stake of the litigation: Belgium, Estonia, Lithuania, Slovakia and Latvia
- 3.4.2 Use of the former schedule of fees: Denmark
- 3.5 The mandatory representation by a
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009639888