- Acknowledgements and Attributions
- Executive Summary
- Introduction
- 1. The Fundamental Questions: proactive and reactive
- 2. Transfer of Responsibility
- 3. Background: Why is or might transfer of responsibility or protection status be an issue in the EU? (Relation to Dublin, Long-term resident third country national directive and other relevant instruments)
- 3.1 The Dublin Context
- 3.2 The Long-term Resident Context
- 4. Explanation of study, reasons for undertaking it, methodology
- 5. Layout of the Report
- Part 1 - Existing international and regional legal framework
- 1. 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees
- 1.1 The apparent centrality of the Travel Document
- 1.2 Extraterritorial Effect of the Determination of Refugee Status
- 1.3 Transfer of residence rights: the actual centrality of lawful residence
- 1.4 The overlap and distinctions between status determination; stay or residence; Travel Documents and protection obligations
- 1.5 Standards of protection obligations and criteria of entitlements to treatment under the 1951 Convention
- 1.5.1 Standards of protection obligations
- 1.5.2 Criteria of entitlements to treatment
- 1.6 Scope of protection responsibilities implied in the transfer of responsibility for issuing Travel Documents: The centrality of lawful residence
- 2. The 1980 European Agreement on Transfer of Responsibility for Refugees
- 2.1 Background
- 2.2 u0093Two years of actual and continuous stayu0094
- 2.3 Scope of responsibility transferred on application of the European Agreement
- 3. Bilateral Agreements
- 4. Convention Status and Subsidiary Protection
- Part 2 - Current Practice
- 1. Description of existing systems for transfer of protection in place in Member States and Switzerland
- 1.1. Countries using the European Agreement on Transfer of Responsibility for Refugees
- 1.2. States not using the European Agreement on transfer of responsibility for refugees
- 2. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of t
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009637490