Testing Dual Labor Market Theory: A Reconsideration of the Evidence
This paper replicates and extends our earlier analysis of dual market theory. We use a technique which estimates for each worker a probability of being in the primary sector on the basis of his characteristics. We use this information to determine the occupational and industrial composition of the sectors. We continue to produce results which are very supportive of the theory. In studies by other authors, workers were "assigned" to the primary or secondary sector on the basis of the industry or occupation in which they are employed and educated guesses about the industries or occupations which make up the two sectors. We find that previous studies, which produced mixed and inconclusive results, had serious misclassification problems. In the cases examined, at least half of all full time prime age male workers identified as being in the secondary sector by these classification schemes are found to have a high probability of primary sector attachment. Past studies which were most supportive of dual market theory are found to have had the least severe misclassification problems.
Year of publication: |
1985-07
|
---|---|
Authors: | Lang, Kevin ; Dickens, William T. |
Institutions: | National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Labor Market Segmentation Theory: Reconsidering the Evidence
Lang, Kevin, (1992)
-
Labor Market Segmentation, Wage Dispersion and Unemployment
Lang, Kevin, (1992)
-
Bilateral Search as an Explanation for Labor Market Segmentation and Other Anomalies
Lang, Kevin, (1993)
- More ...