The Cambridge challenge to the Ricardian analysis of poverty
The Ricardian economists’ famous model of economic growth employed the Malthusian population doctrine, the law of diminishing returns, and the classical or iron law of wages. This analysis was based on utilitarian moral philosophy. The gloomy Stationary State conclusions of the Ricardian growth model — maldistribution of income and widespread poverty — were challenged by both economists and moral philosophers. A particularly important challenge was that offered by William Whewell (1794--1866), Professor of Moral Philosophy and the dominant figure at the University of Cambridge. Whewell is remembered today for his early contributions to mathematical economics. This article begins with a review of the Ricardian growth model. Next, Whewell’s system of moral philosophy is examined and the scientific and religious basis of Whewell’s antagonism to Ricardian economics is considered. After considering Whewell’s treatment of agricultural progress, economic classes, and rent doctrine, his own model of economic growth is analyzed. Finally, Whewell’s appraisal of the duty of government to those harmed by development is explored.
Year of publication: |
1998
|
---|---|
Authors: | Henderson, James |
Published in: |
Forum for Social Economics. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 0736-0932. - Vol. 28.1998, 1, p. 23-34
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Outlook for Russia's oil and gas production and exports
Henderson, James, (2024)
-
The strategic implications of Russia's eastern oil resources
Henderson, James, (2011)
-
Rosneft: On the road to global NOC status?
Henderson, James, (2012)
- More ...