The Consequences of Merit Aid
Since the early Nineties, a dozen states have established broad-based merit aid programs. The typical program waives tuition and fees at public colleges and universities in one’s home state. Unlike traditional merit programs, such as the National Merit Scholarship, this aid requires relatively modest academic performance and provide scholarships to hundreds of thousands of students. This paper examines how merit aid programs in seven states have affected an array of schooling decisions, paying particular attention to how the effects have varied by race and ethnicity. I find that the new programs typically increase the attendance probability of college-age youth by five to seven percentage points. The merit programs also shift students toward four-year schools and away from two-year schools. The Georgia HOPE Scholarship, which has been found to widen racial gaps in college attendance (Dynarski, 2000) is atypical in its distributional impact, with the other state’s programs tending to have a more positive effect on the college attendance rate of Blacks and Hispanics. I attribute HOPE’s unique distributional effect to its relatively stringent academic requirements and a recently-eliminated provision that channeled the most generous scholarships to higher-income students.
Year of publication: |
2002-12
|
---|---|
Authors: | Dynarski, Susan |
Institutions: | Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Does Aid Matter? Measuring the Effect of Student Aid on College Attendance and Completion
Dynarski, Susan, (2001)
-
Building the Stock of College-Educated Labor
Dynarski, Susan, (2005)
-
Complexity and Targeting in Federal Student Aid: A Quantitative Analysis
Dynarski, Susan, (2008)
- More ...