The cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase for first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia : a UK-based cost-utility analysis
Xingdi Hu, Kingsley P. Wildman, Subham Basu, Peggy L. Lin, Clare Rowntree and Vaskar Saha
Background: L-asparaginase is a key component of treatment for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in the UK. Commonly used forms of asparaginase are native E. coli-derived asparaginase (native asparaginase) and pegaspargase in first-line combination therapy, and native Erwinia chrysanthemi-derived asparaginase (Erwinia asparaginase) as second-line treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase in first-line combination therapy for patients with newly diagnosed ALL. A combined decision tree and health-state transition Markov cost-effectiveness model was developed to assess the relative costs and health outcomes of pegaspargase versus native asparaginase in the UK setting. Results: In base case analyses, first-line pegaspargase (followed by Erwinia asparaginase in cases of hypersensitivity) dominated first-line native asparaginase followed by Erwinia asparaginase; i.e. resulted in lower costs and more qualityadjusted life year gain. The favourable hypersensitivity rates and administration profile of pegaspargase led to lifetime cost savings of £4741 versus native asparaginase. Pegaspargase remained cost-effective versus all treatment strategies in all scenario analyses, including use of the 2500 IU/m2 dose, recommended for patients =21 years of age. Conclusions: Pegaspargase, as part of multi-drug chemotherapy, is a cost-effective option for the treatment of newly diagnosed ALL. Based on this study, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisal Committee concluded that it could recommend pegaspargase as a cost-effective use of National Health Service resources in England & Wales for treating ALL in children, young people and adults with untreated, newly diagnosed disease. Trial registration: UKALL 2011, EudraCT number 2010-020924-22; UKALL 2003, EudraCT number 2007-004013-34; UKALL14, EudraCT number 2009-012717-22.
Year of publication: |
2019
|
---|---|
Authors: | Hu, Xingdi ; Wildman, Kingsley P. ; Basu, Subham ; Lin, Peggy L. ; Rowntree, Clare ; Saha, Vaskar |
Published in: |
Health economics review. - Heidelberg : Springer, ISSN 2191-1991, ZDB-ID 2634483-X. - Vol. 9.2019, 40, p. 1-13
|
Subject: | Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia | Asparaginase | Cost-effectiveness | First line treatment | Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse | Cost-benefit analysis | Kosten-Wirksamkeits-Analyse | Cost-effectiveness analysis | Großbritannien | United Kingdom | Theorie | Theory | Gesundheitskosten | Health care costs |
Saved in:
freely available
Type of publication: | Article |
---|---|
Type of publication (narrower categories): | Aufsatz in Zeitschrift ; Article in journal |
Language: | English |
Other identifiers: | 10.1186/s13561-019-0257-3 [DOI] hdl:10419/285153 [Handle] |
Source: | ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW |
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012162665
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Meng, Yang, (2018)
-
How relevant are social costs in economic evaluations? : the case of Alzheimer's disease
Peña-Longobardo, L. M., (2019)
-
Viljoen, Adie, (2023)
- More ...
Similar items by person