The Credibility of Drug Tests: A Multi-Stage Bayesian Analysis
The authors show that even when drug tests are extremely accurate by conventional measures, under some circumstances they will yield a high “false accusation rate†(that is, a high percentage of those testing positive for drugs will not have drugs in their systems). For example, if a drug-testing process that produces only one false positive per 2,000 drug-free specimens, and no false negatives, is administered to a population in which 0.1% of the people use the targeted drugs, one-third of those identified as drug users will be falsely accused. The authors propose a multi-stage Bayesian algorithm—an approach commonly used in management science but novel to industrial relations—that assures that a drug-testing process will have a low enough false accusation rate to provide credible evidence of drug use. They also identify other types of employee evaluations to which Bayesian modeling could be applied.
Year of publication: |
1994
|
---|---|
Authors: | Barnum, Darold T. ; Gleason, John M. |
Published in: |
ILR Review. - Cornell University, ILR School. - Vol. 47.1994, 4, p. 610-621
|
Publisher: |
Cornell University, ILR School |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Measuring efficiency in allocating inputs among outputs with DEA
Barnum, Darold T., (2006)
-
Barnum, Darold T., (2006)
-
Toward valid measures of public sector productivity : performance measures in urban transit
Gleason, John M., (1982)
- More ...