The effects of disclosure type and audit committee expertise on Chief Audit Executives' tolerance for financial misstatements
This study involves an experiment where 73 Chief Audit Executives and deputy Chief Audit Executives determine the amount of adjustment required to correct a misstatement. We manipulate the financial reporting location of the misstatement (recognized vs. disclosed) and the level of audit committee expertise (high vs. low). The results indicate that financial reporting location has significant effects on internal auditors' decisions to correct misstatements. Specifically, internal auditors are more willing to waive disclosed misstatements relative to recognized misstatements. Contrary to expectations, the results do not indicate that increased audit committee expertise and associated increases in audit committee members' perceived powers cause internal auditors to be less willing to waive misstatements.
Year of publication: |
2011
|
---|---|
Authors: | Norman, Carolyn Strand ; Rose, Jacob M. ; Suh, Ik Seon |
Published in: |
Accounting, Organizations and Society. - Elsevier, ISSN 0361-3682. - Vol. 36.2011, 2, p. 102-108
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Strand Norman, Carolyn, (2011)
-
Norman, Carolyn Strand, (2011)
-
Internal audit reporting lines, fraud risk decomposition, and assessments of fraud risk
Norman, Carolyn Strand, (2010)
- More ...