The Extent of Measurement Error in Longitudinal Earnings Data: Do Two Wrongs Make a Right?
This article examines the properties and prevalence of measurement error in longitudinal earnings data. The analysis compares matched Current Population Survey data to administrative Social Security payroll tax records. In contrast to typically assumed properties of measurement error, the results indicate that errors are serially correlated over two years and negatively correlated with true earnings (i.e., mean reverting). In a cross section, the ratio of the variance of the signal to the total variance is 0.82 for men and 0.92 for women. These ratios fall to 0.65 and 0.81 when the data are specified in first differences. Longitudinal earnings data may be more reliable than previously believed. Copyright 1991 by University of Chicago Press.
Year of publication: |
1991
|
---|---|
Authors: | Bound, John ; Krueger, Alan B |
Published in: |
Journal of Labor Economics. - University of Chicago Press. - Vol. 9.1991, 1, p. 1-24
|
Publisher: |
University of Chicago Press |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Time-Series Minimum-Wage Studies: A Meta-analysis.
Card, David, (1995)
-
Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
Card, David, (1994)
-
Victorian Financial Crises and their Implications for the Future
Krueger, Alan B, (2010)
- More ...