The Hausmann-Gorky effect
Mitu Gulati, Ugo Panizza
On May 26, 2017, Harvard economist Ricardo Hausmann published an Op Ed titled “Hunger Bonds”, urging investors to avoid Venezuelan sovereign bonds on the grounds that the country was prioritizing payments on the bonds over remedying a humanitarian crisis. Contemporaneously, news emerged regarding a suspicious looking bond issue by Venezuela’s oil company that was purchased largely by Goldman Sachs. That bond got tagged with the label “Hunger Bond”, and suffered a price hit. Using both quantitative data and interviews with investors, we examine the causes of the Hunger Bond penalty, its impact on the prices of other outstanding Venezuelan bonds, and how long it was sustained. The primary determinants of the Hunger Bond penalty appear to have been a combination of negative press attention and crowd-sourced disapproval. For instance, we show that a large number of Google searches for “Hunger Bonds” are associated with a 200 basis point increase in the spread of the bond purchased by Goldman Sachs.
Year of publication: |
2020
|
---|---|
Authors: | Gulati, Mitu ; Panizza, Ugo |
Published in: |
Journal of business ethics : JBE. - Dordrecht : Springer, ISSN 1573-0697, ZDB-ID 1478688-6. - Vol. 166.2020, 1, p. 175-195
|
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Gulati, Mitu, (2018)
-
Gulati, Mitu, (2018)
-
When governments promise to prioritize public debt: Do markets care?
Gulati, Mitu, (2019)
- More ...