The Impact of Principles-Based versus Rules-Based Accounting Standards on Reporting Quality and Earnings Management

Purpose – The aim is to explore whether principles-based versus rules-based accounting standards have an effect on measures of financial reporting quality and earnings management strategies. Design/methodology/approach – This study uses a firm-year-specific variable that captures the extent to which firms' accounting and operating behaviour is affected by the characteristics of a specific standard in the United States. Measures of absolute accruals, financial misconduct, signed accruals and abnormal cash flows are used to assess the effects. Findings – The results show that absolute magnitude of accruals and probability of financial misconduct is lower, and accrual earnings management is higher when firms' standards are more based on principles. The study also suggests that potentially costlier real earnings management is a consequence of rules-based standards. Research limitations/implications – This study relies heavily on measures from the prior accounting literature, hence, care has been exercised in generalising the findings.Practical implications – This study has direct implications for a number of stakeholders, including standard setters, policymakers, securities regulators, researchers, investors, financial statement preparers, and auditors. For example, the future development of accounting standards can be supported by the empirical conclusions in this study together with previous standard setting ambitions, commentaries, experiments, analytical work. Originality/value – This study extends prior single-country studies on reporting quality and cross-country studies on transition effects of firms switching from local to international accounting standards by observing the impact of accounting standard characteristics on additional measures of reporting quality and accrual as well as real earnings management when holding institutional factors constant. The study also offers archival evidence complementing prior commentaries, experiments, and analytical work