The Importance of Pecuniary and Non-Pecuniary Rewards in Job Choice
A positive correlation between pecuniary and non-pecuniary job returns does not necessarily invalidate Adam Smith’s thesis about compensating wage differentials. Compensation should still occur within a given set of job opportunities for each individual. This paper tests empirically a model that distinguishes between factors which affect the number and types of potential jobs open to a person, and, preferences which determine the ultimate choice from these options. It was found that women, especially women with children under 18 years of age, people who are more religious and people from English speaking backgrounds appear to value non-pecuniary job advantages more highly than other groups, ceteris paribus. Other labour market characteristics, such as further schooling, and maturity appear to make people select pecuniary job rewards over intrinsic satisfaction.
Year of publication: |
2001-12
|
---|---|
Authors: | Webster, Elizabeth ; Bainger, Thea |
Institutions: | Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (MIAESR), Faculty of Business and Economics |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The importance of precuniary and non-precuniary rewards in job choice
Webster, Elizabeth, (2001)
-
The Design of R&D Support Schemes for Industry
Thomson, Russell, (2011)
-
Do Patents Shield Disclosure or Assure Exclusivity When Transacting Technology?
Rassenfosse, Gaétan de, (2013)
- More ...